🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where election day turned out somewhat badly for him, where the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously went for Zohran this year. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over half. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I wish he does so afterwards no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents all went for Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. But overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election we reported on if the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.